The Dark and Stormy Knight

Sir Acbart VII, a fallen noble knight of the alternate verson of Canterlot, has made a surprising complamation: He has denounced being evil and now wishes to serve under the Grand Council and the Heroes Act. Natrolly, everyone is confused. Wasn't Acbart, evil? Acbart explained that he was actselly malmitulated by an evil enemy of the kingdom, Groonsbar "the dark and treacherious", a giant magical dragon-like creature with the persona of "New Hobbet" Smaug that long attempts to destroy the kingdom! However, Acbart warns that the curse still resides him, and has lately been off and on, espeically when he was away from Qui. Acbart wants to redeem the actions he wasn't conusiouly intent on doing by becoming a heroes act member. However, the Heroes Act and the Grand Council are, understandily caunious, espeically when this corruptive curse can make him suddenly evil in a second, and it would invite further controversey already added by the resent Sea Squirl debactle. But Acbart quickly suggested that they unite togather to slaw Groonsbar forever. But Acbart isn't hestitate to say that if the curse activates again, put him out of his misery and let him die a warrior. The Heroes Act want this tragic tale to be given a much better ending, and call in the lougers to help in bringing in the end of Groonsbar. But can our heroes make sure Groonsbar is the only one who meets his end?